Nepean District results
Elected member
GROTH, Sam
Liberal
Recheck votes
-
Total enrolment as at close of rolls:
48944
-
Formal votes:
40766
-
Informal votes:
2753 (6.33% of the total votes)
-
Total votes:
43519 (88.92% of the total enrolment as at the close of rolls)
Recheck first preference votes
| Candidate | Party | 1st pref. votes | % votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| MILLER, Jay | Companions and Pets Party | 526 | 1.29% |
| DIJKMAN, Janny | Family First Victoria | 638 | 1.57% |
| ENGELANDER, Pamela | Animal Justice Party | 720 | 1.77% |
| AINSLIE, Charelle | 449 | 1.10% | |
| GROTH, Sam | Liberal | 19614 | 48.11% |
| GLEIXNER, Esther | Australian Greens | 3576 | 8.77% |
| ANGER, Steve | 91 | 0.22% | |
| LEINE, Hank | Freedom Party of Victoria | 980 | 2.40% |
| WOOLCOCK, Elizabeth | 495 | 1.21% | |
| BRAYNE, Chris | Australian Labor Party - Victorian Branch | 13308 | 32.64% |
| SKRUZNY, Cynthia | Labour DLP | 369 | 0.91% |
Primary results for Nepean District (Excel)
Results after distribution of preferences
| Candidate | Party | Votes after distribution | % votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| GROTH, Sam | Liberal | 20603 | 50.54% |
| GLEIXNER, Esther | Australian Greens | 4436 | 10.88% |
| LEINE, Hank | Freedom Party of Victoria | 1808 | 4.44% |
| BRAYNE, Chris | Australian Labor Party - Victorian Branch | 13919 | 34.14% |
Two candidate preferred vote
Two candidate preferred results by voting centre
The two-candidate preferred (2CP) count has been replaced by the preference distribution. You can still see the 2CP results by voting centre at the link above.
The two-candidate preferred count gives an early indication of the election results. It plays no role in deciding the actual successful candidate. There may be minor changes as the results are rechecked and preferences distributed.
Learn more about the two-candidate preferred count (video).
The two-candidate preferred (2CP) count has been replaced by the preference distribution. You can still see the 2CP results by voting centre at the link above.
The two-candidate preferred count gives an early indication of the election results. It plays no role in deciding the actual successful candidate. There may be minor changes as the results are rechecked and preferences distributed.
Full preference distribution
This district would normally not require a full preference distribution because the elected candidate achieved an absolute majority before all or any preferences were distributed. In 2023, we conducted an indicative full preference distribution for information and statistical purposes.